the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

What do you think about the latest hot topic from the 100 Hour Board? Speak your piece here!

Moderator: Marduk

Post Reply
NovemberEast
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 2:50 pm
Location: Texas, God Bless

the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by NovemberEast »

The only thing I have to say about whether or not leggings make short things modest is this EFY book from the 80's

http://www.abebooks.com/Feeling-Great-D ... 5757620/bd

but let's be clear I don't wear bike shorts under my shorts. but hey...if that's your thing I'm not going to think you're immodest.

Also, Zed did an awesome job with her response.
User avatar
Shrinky Dink
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:21 pm

Re: the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by Shrinky Dink »

I've worn yoga pants under shorts before, but that's because if you want to wear shorts while working out at BYU-I, they have to be the "approved" ones that are only suitable for guys with a 32" inseam and completely neglect the fact that girls wear their pants differently than guys and that tall people exist. Since I have a 35" inseam and am a girl, the shorts are about an inch too short to cover my garments while standing and 3 inches to short to cover my garments while sitting or working out.
*Insert Evil Laughter Here*
User avatar
Marduk
Most Attractive Mod
Posts: 2995
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Orem, UT
Contact:

Re: the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by Marduk »

I bet the question asker also thinks that women never get catcalled.
Deus ab veritas
User avatar
yayfulness
Board Writer
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 8:41 pm

Re: the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by yayfulness »

For some reason, this makes me think of that time a few years ago when someone thought sandals were immodest because he had a foot fetish... anyone else remember that one?
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 1321
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:16 pm
Contact:

Re: the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by Digit »

I wonder if there are calf/forearm/shoulder fetishes in Saudi Arabia.
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
User avatar
Whistler
Posts: 2221
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:17 pm
Contact:

Re: the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by Whistler »

yayfulness wrote:For some reason, this makes me think of that time a few years ago when someone thought sandals were immodest because he had a foot fetish... anyone else remember that one?
yes, which helped me realize that... at some point I don't care if it turns someone on, I'm just going to have to wear something.
User avatar
yayfulness
Board Writer
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 8:41 pm

Re: the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by yayfulness »

Link, mostly because it contains the best accidental innuendo I have made in my life (as yayfulness, anyway).

It is weird reading stuff I wrote three and a half years ago. Almost like reading something written by an entirely different person.
User avatar
yayfulness
Board Writer
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 8:41 pm

Re: the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by yayfulness »

Marduk wrote:I bet the question asker also thinks that women never get catcalled.
"I don't ever see it, therefore it doesn't exist." Probably one of the biggest barriers to understanding that the world has to offer. Your life experiences and circle of friends are not a representative sample and should not be treated as such.
User avatar
Portia
Posts: 5186
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:06 am
Location: Zion

Re: the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by Portia »

Digit wrote:I wonder if there are calf/forearm/shoulder fetishes in Saudi Arabia.
You've heard the term "porn shoulders"? Since I've personally experienced it here, going to go with "yes."
User avatar
Marduk
Most Attractive Mod
Posts: 2995
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Orem, UT
Contact:

Re: the modesty shaming valentines letter #85338

Post by Marduk »

Whistler wrote:
yayfulness wrote:For some reason, this makes me think of that time a few years ago when someone thought sandals were immodest because he had a foot fetish... anyone else remember that one?
yes, which helped me realize that... at some point I don't care if it turns someone on, I'm just going to have to wear something.
Yeah, because wearing nothing would turn way more people on.
Deus ab veritas
Post Reply