#50987 Mega Pyramid

What do you think about the latest hot topic from the 100 Hour Board? Speak your piece here!

Moderator: Marduk

Post Reply
Fredjikrang
Never Coming Back?
Posts: 2031
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:59 am
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

#50987 Mega Pyramid

Post by Fredjikrang »

Just thought I would point out that I think Ƥ. Ɗ. Kirĸe misunderstood something about the pyramid. While he is right that it probably isn't ever going to be practical, and definitely won't be for a long time if it ever does become so, I don't think he understood the design idea very well.

The Pyramid is basically a bubble city, so while the entire structure is a pyramid, most people would probably be living in buildings like sky scrapers. So the only difference really between it and a regular city is that there is a big wall of glass, and a supporting infrastructure, a couple miles away. So it would be kind of like living in a house in a giant greenhouse.

At least that is how I understand it.
[img]http://fredjikrang.petfish.net/Fence-banner.png[/img]
Neologism
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:16 pm

Post by Neologism »

You're right, Fred, in that he skyscraper type buildings are suspended in the pyramid itself. Although, I'm pretty sure that they nixed the idea of putting the glass all around the pyramid. I think they were/are (I highly doubt that it will ever be built...) just going to leave it open.
or so this werf thinks...
Fredjikrang
Never Coming Back?
Posts: 2031
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:59 am
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

Post by Fredjikrang »

Hmm. If it's not enclosed, then there doesn't seem to be much point in building the giant superstructure.
[img]http://fredjikrang.petfish.net/Fence-banner.png[/img]
Neologism
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:16 pm

Post by Neologism »

I think its basically because they don't have anymore room on the ground there, so their putting it in the water. The whole thing seems like kind of a dumb idea to me, though. If the glass was on it, the force of the wind could cause it to break or something like that. They asked these wind testers (who knew there was such a profession!) who had done some pyramid casino or something in Vegas and they said that having glass on Shimizu's Pyramid could be a hazard...
or so this werf thinks...
Fredjikrang
Never Coming Back?
Posts: 2031
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:59 am
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

Post by Fredjikrang »

Well, sure. If it was glass. But you could easily make injection molded (or machined) polycarbonate windows that could withstand it. It would put a lot of stress on the superstructure, I suppose, but the windows themselves wouldn't be a hazard.
[img]http://fredjikrang.petfish.net/Fence-banner.png[/img]
Neologism
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:16 pm

Post by Neologism »

Good call.
or so this werf thinks...
User avatar
vorpal blade
Posts: 1750
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:08 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: #50987 Mega Pyramid

Post by vorpal blade »

Fredjikrang wrote:Just thought I would point out that I think Ƥ. Ɗ. Kirĸe misunderstood something about the pyramid. While he is right that it probably isn't ever going to be practical, and definitely won't be for a long time if it ever does become so, I don't think he understood the design idea very well.

The Pyramid is basically a bubble city, so while the entire structure is a pyramid, most people would probably be living in buildings like sky scrapers. So the only difference really between it and a regular city is that there is a big wall of glass, and a supporting infrastructure, a couple miles away. So it would be kind of like living in a house in a giant greenhouse.

At least that is how I understand it.
Man, are you disagreeing with the writers yet again? :D

It is tempting to go over the top with this, and say you shouldn't "go off" on every little thing, and we can count on you defending pyramids, right or wrong, and all that. But, that would be just plain obnoxious.

Okay, I apologize for my previous remarks impugning your objectivity. I was out of line. Forgive me?
Post Reply