Girls.
-
Craig Jessop
- Pulchritudinous
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:55 pm
Re: Girls.
Probably for a male, too. I mean, think about it. There would be nothing worse than a motorcycling, chaps clad woman hungering for your flesh, especially in a non-lusty way.
-
Laser Jock
- Tech Admin
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Girls.
Man. It'd been a few days since this thread was updated, so when I saw your post I couldn't remember any context for the thread at all. (And your post happened to be at the top of a new page.) It was confusing, to say the least.Craig Jessop wrote:Probably for a male, too. I mean, think about it. There would be nothing worse than a motorcycling, chaps clad woman hungering for your flesh, especially in a non-lusty way.
-
Dragon Lady
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:07 pm
- Location: Riverton, UT
Re: Girls.
Seconded.Laser Jock wrote:Man. It'd been a few days since this thread was updated, so when I saw your post I couldn't remember any context for the thread at all. (And your post happened to be at the top of a new page.) It was confusing, to say the least.Craig Jessop wrote:Probably for a male, too. I mean, think about it. There would be nothing worse than a motorcycling, chaps clad woman hungering for your flesh, especially in a non-lusty way.
Re: Girls.
But it would make for a great title bar.