Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Any miscellaneous posts can live here.
User avatar
Giovanni Schwartz
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:41 pm

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Giovanni Schwartz »

I also feel like maybe they have more questions than they can handle. (I love you all, writers, but I haven't had a question not go over in a loooong time.)
Chrysanthemum
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:06 pm

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Chrysanthemum »

Most of the overdue questions are answered, but someone has a placeholder that's keeping it from being posted.
User avatar
Portia
Posts: 5186
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:06 am
Location: Zion

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Portia »

UffishThought wrote:Are you guys looking for more readers? When I was there I felt like we always had more questions than we could handle--advertising for more was the last thing on my mind.
This might be my hipster showing, but I always thought that the primary appeal of the Board was its semi-secret cabal-ness.
User avatar
Giovanni Schwartz
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:41 pm

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Giovanni Schwartz »

In light of that question, I redid the MBTI. I am:

ISFJ
Introvert(33%) Sensing(1%) Feeling(12%) Judging(78%)

However, I found an old thread, where I was

INFJ
Introvert(22%) Intuitive(62%) Feeling(50%) Judging(89%)

Looks like I'm mostly becoming more... normalized? Except introversion. I SWEAR I am getting less introverted, but apparently not.
UffishThought
Posts: 758
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by UffishThought »

Well, it's always possible that you know yourself better than the test knows you.
User avatar
Giovanni Schwartz
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:41 pm

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Giovanni Schwartz »

I should also say, I am introverted more than extroverted. But I am better at putting on an extroverted face than I used to be.
User avatar
Defy V
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:58 am

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Defy V »

I took that test once and was an ESFP and then took it two years later to become an INFJ. I think I changed a lot in those two years, but not that much.

Also, I am so tired of people defining introvert as someone who needs to be alone to re-energize. I think that's silly. The standard definition given by Google of an introvert is someone who is shy and reticent. Yet we have all these people who are way outgoing and gregarious who call themselves introverts because they like to read a good book every now and then. Sometimes I feel energized by hanging out with large crowds, sometimes with small groups, and sometimes by being by myself. What does that make me?
User avatar
bobtheenchantedone
Forum Administrator
Posts: 4229
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:20 pm
Location: At work
Contact:

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by bobtheenchantedone »

Unable to be labeled?
The Epistler was quite honestly knocked on her ethereal behind by the sheer logic of this.
User avatar
Defy V
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:58 am

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Defy V »

I prefer to call it a whatevert. :)
User avatar
Whistler
Posts: 2221
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Whistler »

I think for me it's more about how I know the group rather than its size. I can be with a huge group of people for several days at a family reunion. But after three hours of church and being around lots of people whom I can't predict or don't know or whose names I've forgotten several times drains me.
User avatar
Giovanni Schwartz
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:41 pm

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Giovanni Schwartz »

Yes. This.
User avatar
Marduk
Most Attractive Mod
Posts: 2995
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Orem, UT
Contact:

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Marduk »

I think it has to do more with the sorts of relationships you prefer. Extroverts traditionally prefer quantity of relationships over quality, while introverts are the inverse. That is to say, an introvert prefers fewer but deeper relationships, an extrovert prefers more but less deep relationships.
Deus ab veritas
User avatar
yayfulness
Board Writer
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 8:41 pm

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by yayfulness »

Marduk wrote:I think it has to do more with the sorts of relationships you prefer. Extroverts traditionally prefer quantity of relationships over quality, while introverts are the inverse. That is to say, an introvert prefers fewer but deeper relationships, an extrovert prefers more but less deep relationships.
TRUTH. For me, anyway.
Zedability
Posts: 987
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:17 pm

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Zedability »

I know for me, being an introvert means that I genuinely just don't care to talk to people or hang out with them, save for a select view. I'm perfectly happy spending every single weekend home alone, and sometimes I'll just randomly stop texting people or facebooking them for hours on end because I just. Do. Not. Want. To. Talk. Even though I like them and was enjoying the conversation. And I find hanging out with large groups, or with new people, a stressful and exhausting idea. Even when I'm enjoying myself in such situations, it's extremely draining and the enjoyment is only superficial at best.
Katya
Board Board Patron Saint
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:40 am
Location: Utah

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Katya »

Marduk wrote:I think it has to do more with the sorts of relationships you prefer. Extroverts traditionally prefer quantity of relationships over quality, while introverts are the inverse. That is to say, an introvert prefers fewer but deeper relationships, an extrovert prefers more but less deep relationships.
Right. And that's not the same thing as shyness or reticence. So, regardless of how you define "introvert," we do need a word for people who (among other things) prefer a few deep relationships over a lot of casual ones.
User avatar
Marduk
Most Attractive Mod
Posts: 2995
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Orem, UT
Contact:

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Marduk »

And then there's me, who apparently prefers many deep relationships, which leaves me in a place that is confused and muddled.
Deus ab veritas
Katya
Board Board Patron Saint
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:40 am
Location: Utah

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Katya »

Marduk wrote:And then there's me, who apparently prefers many deep relationships, which leaves me in a place that is confused and muddled.
Or . . . busy.
User avatar
Whistler
Posts: 2221
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Whistler »

you're just superior at relationships
C is for
um Administrator
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by C is for »

Whistler wrote:you're just superior at relationships
zing
User avatar
Defy V
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:58 am

Re: Happy Days in Random Chatter 10

Post by Defy V »

But now we have a new definition of introvert and extrovert that needs to be backed up by the OED or something.
Post Reply