censorship

Your chance to pontificate on the subject of your choice. (Please keep it PG-rated.)
Post Reply
User avatar
Portia
Posts: 5186
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:06 am
Location: Zion

censorship

Post by Portia »

http://images.chron.com/apps/comics/ima ... .337.g.gif

http://newnewsnet.byu.edu/pdf/du20080627.pdf

So I wonder what caused the Daily Universe to censor the June 27th Non Sequitur. If anything, it supports the Honor Code and all that, right? I.e., premature sex can lead to "unintended consequences," so that would be one reason not to do so?
Nanti-SARRMM
Posts: 1958
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:02 pm
Location: Beyond the Mountains of the Copper Miners into the Desert of Absolute Boredom
Contact:

Re: censorship

Post by Nanti-SARRMM »

Portia wrote:http://images.chron.com/apps/comics/ima ... .337.g.gif

http://newnewsnet.byu.edu/pdf/du20080627.pdf

So I wonder what caused the Daily Universe to censor the June 27th Non Sequitur. If anything, it supports the Honor Code and all that, right? I.e., premature sex can lead to "unintended consequences," so that would be one reason not to do so?
They also censored Dilbert a few months ago when there was a hispanic by the name of Jesus (pronounced hey*zues) in it.
This site, and the opinions and statements contained herein do not necessarily reflect on my sanity, or lack thereof.
User avatar
Benvolio
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:22 am
Location: Nashville, TN

Post by Benvolio »

I've never been able to figure out those types of decisions. This one especially doesn't make much sense. If you talk to anyone at Newsnet they sound very confident about their "freedom of the press," but the reality is somewhat different. I don't mean that as criticism; I just think it's odd. I don't really fault the university or the Church for censoring stuff. If I were them, I'd rule with an iron fist. I'd be interested to see how those decisions are made.
- Benvolio
User avatar
Portia
Posts: 5186
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:06 am
Location: Zion

Post by Portia »

Benvolio wrote:This one especially doesn't make much sense.
Exactly. I don't feel inconvenienced for having had to find it online, and I'm not going to write an angry letter, but as someone who reads the comics regularly, it's very obvious when they substitute it with one that ran earlier that month.

Just seems odd, is all.
Post Reply