Page 3 of 5

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:55 pm
by Squirrel
Tally, THAT WAS TOTALLY WICKED!!!!!!!

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:01 pm
by Tally M.
?

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:07 pm
by Squirrel
that kid on the trike in the Incredibles. When something awesome happens he says "That was totally wicked!"

.........

anyway, today's Board post was super awesome. That's what I meant to say.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:09 pm
by Tally M.
Ah, the second part is what I didn't get.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:18 pm
by Squirrel
? you lost me.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:20 pm
by Tally M.
Never mind.

Point being--A writer is in my class, probably my linguistics class...and knows I'm looking for werf.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:34 pm
by Squirrel
:-D

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:10 pm
by Giovanni Schwartz
Tally! You can be Board Stalker, part V. I believe Katya was first. Then Tangerine. Then chillygator. Then me. And now Tally! Congratulations!

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:55 pm
by Tally M.
Yay! :D Maybe that can be my title! #dontactuallycareaboutthosethings

I need more information...And a class list. My linguistics class doesn't have a list of people available.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:21 am
by Tally M.
Now, if I knew who the Board writer was...maybe the Board writer would like to study with me for our upcoming test...(which covers like, four of my classes, not just my linguistics class).

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:20 pm
by Giovanni Schwartz
I just decided: I bet that there's not even a writer in your classes. They just said that to screw with you.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:57 pm
by UffishThought
That's what I would have done.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:11 pm
by Squirrel
Giovanni Schwartz wrote:I just decided: I bet that there's not even a writer in your classes. They just said that to screw with you.
What's up with writers being mean to newbies? Really, guys?

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:29 pm
by Portia
Don't take it personally. It's all in good fun.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:12 pm
by Giovanni Schwartz
Well, I just have to say 1) How would they have known that she was Tally M.? I mean, they don't exactly stalk your anonymity.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:15 pm
by Tally M.
I have a theory how they would know =P And trust me, it's a fairly decent theory.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:21 pm
by UffishThought
How is it mean? If Tally's enjoying the possibility that he may have met a writer without realizing it, what's the harm in making his classes more pleasant by letting him daydream about which class and which person it may be? Especially if it might be true, since I don't know who he is either?

Of course, if the writer DOES know Tally (and the fact that the answer was extra-anonymous might support that theory,) then there's an even greater chance it's true.

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:53 pm
by yayfulness
[awkward internet moment]Tally = female.[/awkward internet moment]

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:05 pm
by Zedability
I'm just going to say I knew who Tally M. was long before the rest of the writers :P And I'm not going to tell you how I found out, either :P

Re: Linguistics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:26 pm
by UffishThought
Oh, oops. Sorry about that.