BQ #74344 Mean writers
Moderator: Marduk
-
- Board Writer
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:54 pm
BQ #74344 Mean writers
The reader in BQ #74344 seems to think we're mean, so I'm curious - which writers do you think are meanest/scariest/most hostile/most intimidating? Vote for up to three.
Last edited by Genuine Article on Sun Sep 22, 2013 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:19 pm
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
I feel like it's a golden age of the board fallacy. There were writers in my day and before who were rude. Whose trademarks were being rude. And sometimes I loved it, sometimes I thought it was too much. I guess it probably depended on how much I agreed with them. But I don't feel like it's a recent trend.
- Indefinite Integral
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:57 am
- Location: Not Quite Provo...ish
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
Looking at that list, I really don't think there is a mean writer on staff right now. Not compared to years previous anyway. Gimgimno can be a little snarky from time to time, but he doesn't even answer that much any more.
If I were to say anything about this generation of writers, it would be that overall they are more concerned and caring than many of previous generations. Maybe this questioner was interpreting concern as rudeness?
If I were to say anything about this generation of writers, it would be that overall they are more concerned and caring than many of previous generations. Maybe this questioner was interpreting concern as rudeness?
"The pursuit of mathematics is a divine madness of the human spirit." ~ Alfred North Whitehead
-
- Board Writer
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:54 pm
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
Aw, come on. It's no fun if no one votes.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 2:06 pm
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
I don't feel like any of the writers are outright mean, but sometimes I feel like their secondary aliases or whoever is the voice behind some of the lesser used names like "Snarky Snicket" are often rude. I get that SS is from the Snicket books and is trying to mimic him and be funny and stuff, but most of the time I feel like it's completely unnecessary and for people who don't get the reference, it may be hurtful. I feel like the secondary nyms are just being used for writers to hide behind and be cutting.
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
Hah, my name is spelled wrong-- maybe that will throw people off my trail and I won't get any mean votes.
Although I am curious to know who "we" is in that asker's question. And I'd like to know specifics. I do agree that sometimes writers can be snarky (and Anonymous Reader, I have to agree- I find that some of the things the secondary nyms say are really not necessary, but that could be because I haven't yet created a secondary nym and discovered their potential value) but really, the majority are not and when something mean is said, the person taking offense should e-mail the writer(s) and deal with it one on one, instead of lambasting the entire board, because hey, that stings a bit.
Although I am curious to know who "we" is in that asker's question. And I'd like to know specifics. I do agree that sometimes writers can be snarky (and Anonymous Reader, I have to agree- I find that some of the things the secondary nyms say are really not necessary, but that could be because I haven't yet created a secondary nym and discovered their potential value) but really, the majority are not and when something mean is said, the person taking offense should e-mail the writer(s) and deal with it one on one, instead of lambasting the entire board, because hey, that stings a bit.
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
Ding ding ding! We have a winner! I think the current writers are lightweights on snarkiness. I almost voted for Squirrel, for irony.UffishThought wrote:I feel like it's a golden age of the board fallacy. There were writers in my day and before who were rude. Whose trademarks were being rude. And sometimes I loved it, sometimes I thought it was too much. I guess it probably depended on how much I agreed with them. But I don't feel like it's a recent trend.
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
Squirrel and Yayfulness are the meanest writers EVAH.
Also, I agree with everyone who said it is the secondary nyms that tend to say rude things. I can't remember anything lately that seemed too harsh. Most of the times when things come off as harsh I think it is because the writer is projecting from their own life (which is understandable) instead of seeing things from the reader's perspective, or because they are being too honest when IRL no one would respond with such honesty (which is really a pro for the Board as an advice place).
Also, I agree with everyone who said it is the secondary nyms that tend to say rude things. I can't remember anything lately that seemed too harsh. Most of the times when things come off as harsh I think it is because the writer is projecting from their own life (which is understandable) instead of seeing things from the reader's perspective, or because they are being too honest when IRL no one would respond with such honesty (which is really a pro for the Board as an advice place).
-
- Board Writer
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:54 pm
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
No way I'm letting you off the hook; it's fixed now.Concorde wrote:Hah, my name is spelled wrong-- maybe that will throw people off my trail and I won't get any mean votes.
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
Portia wrote: I almost voted for Squirrel, for irony.
HAH! I can be quite mean if I want to. The problem is that most of the time I really don't want to be mean, which makes rudeness difficult, for sure.mic0 wrote:Squirrel and Yayfulness are the meanest writers EVAH.
Edit: But writers aren't trying to be rude, just blunt. Which isn't much different than being rude. But still- sometimes bluntness is called for.
Last edited by Squirrel on Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
YOU'RE ALL SO MEAN!!!!!!!!!!!!! SO MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
beautiful, dirty, rich
- SmurfBlueSnuggie
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:47 am
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
Yeah, Gimpers is snarky. But not mean, usually. I think most of the "mean" feelings come when a question wasn't clear. Or the writers interpret it wrong. I know I've read some where three answers post, and they are all harsh. But to me, the question was something that needed comfort and support. In the Board's defense, this happens the other way too, where the answers are all waaay more gentle than the reader probably deserves. This is the downfall of emotion-free textual communication.
It doesn't matter what happened to get you to today, beyond shaping your understanding. What really matters is where you go from here.
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
Yeah, I don't feel like it's meanness so much as bluntness. I know some of you writers personally, so I know your bluntness isn't meant to make people feel bad (more like... to inform them of where you stand?), but other people might not see it that way. Maybe it's their problem.
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
The original question said "hypersensitive." How did we get from there to "mean"?
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
Because the board writers are hypersensitive.Portia wrote:The original question said "hypersensitive." How did we get from there to "mean"?
Deus ab veritas
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
We are noooootttt! How could you say that? You are so mean!!!Marduk wrote:Because the board writers are hypersensitive.Portia wrote:The original question said "hypersensitive." How did we get from there to "mean"?
- vorpal blade
- Posts: 1750
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:08 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
That was funny, Marduk, but I think it is fair to summarize what the reader asked by saying he/she thought some writers of the Board are mean. It is mean to write like you think the reader is a "terrriby ignorant or arrogant" person. It is mean to offer unsolicited advice "after blasting and belittling the indefensible reader." Calling people "selfish, racist, sexist" when they don't deserve it is mean. Hostility can be mean.
That being said, I don't agree with the person who asked the question. In my limited observation of the Board in the last three months I find the Board writers go out of their way to be nice and polite. I think they address the readers sweetly, but there have been a few times where they referred to others (like a certain stake president) in a way that was mean. In the more distant past I think some of the writers were not as careful to be nice as the current writers.
Probably I'm thought of as mean from time to time, but I never think of myself that way.
That being said, I don't agree with the person who asked the question. In my limited observation of the Board in the last three months I find the Board writers go out of their way to be nice and polite. I think they address the readers sweetly, but there have been a few times where they referred to others (like a certain stake president) in a way that was mean. In the more distant past I think some of the writers were not as careful to be nice as the current writers.
Probably I'm thought of as mean from time to time, but I never think of myself that way.
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
aw man. shouldn't've retired. i could have gotten a vote or two.
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
You were the first person I looked for, no joke.No Dice wrote:aw man. shouldn't've retired. i could have gotten a vote or two.
- Giovanni Schwartz
- Posts: 3396
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:41 pm
Re: BQ #74344 Mean writers
No Dice is one of my all time favorite writers. Because while he may have been caustic (a lot of the time), his answers were never over-the-line rude.