Hymn #19

What do you think about the latest hot topic from the 100 Hour Board? Speak your piece here!

Moderator: Marduk

C is for
um Administrator
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:43 pm

Hymn #19

Post by C is for »

A couple things (this may get a tad soapboxy, but as it's a response to a question today it should be fine):

1. It's always struck me as odd that the last verse of "We Thank Thee, O God, for a Prophet" ends on a negative note. I've found that the last verse, and the last line, are often the most meaningful and uplifting in hymns, so to have it talk about people rejecting glad messages has always been ... odd. Interesting that the RLDS church omitted that whole verse. (And so did we, I guess?)

2. The pronoun doesn't shift halfway through the second verse (well, okay, it does, but not in the way people are always saying). People have been saying that for years (starting with my first release-time seminary teacher), but it's just not true. The entire song is directed to God. We thank thee, O God for a prophet. We thank thee for sending the gospel. We thank thee for every blessing.

The pronoun shift goes from a "thee" to a "him". Still talking about the Lord, though. It's a hymn to the Lord, thanking him for the many blessings of the gospel he has given us! And I love it. I love this hymn.
Katya
Board Board Patron Saint
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:40 am
Location: Utah

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Katya »

C is for wrote:2. The pronoun doesn't shift halfway through the second verse (well, okay, it does, but not in the way people are always saying). People have been saying that for years (starting with my first release-time seminary teacher), but it's just not true. The entire song is directed to God. We thank thee, O God for a prophet. We thank thee for sending the gospel. We thank thee for every blessing.

The pronoun shift goes from a "thee" to a "him". Still talking about the Lord, though. It's a hymn to the Lord, thanking him for the many blessings of the gospel he has given us! And I love it. I love this hymn.
Interesting observation! (Although "thee" isn't mentioned in the beginning of the 2nd verse, so you could argue that the shift takes place before the second verse, not in the middle of it.)
Foreman
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:31 am

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Foreman »

I do know the entire song is about the Lord, by the way. It's just in second person for the first half, and switches to third person at that point in the second verse. Thus, the "pronoun shifting" remark. I think a lot of people get that the song is thanking the Lord in the beginning, but think that the third-person pronoun is still referring to the former third-person subject (the prophet) rather than the new one (the Lord).
Wisteria
Posts: 703
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 9:59 am

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Wisteria »

I always cringed a little at the end of the second and third verses. I get that "the wicked who fight against Zion shall surely be smitten at last" probably has a different connotation to someone who's been attacked by mobs, but it always sounded a little petulant to me. And I agree with C4- while "they who reject this glad message shall never such happiness know" is doctrinally correct, it sounds a little too much like little kids comparing things to me. It doesn't bug me as much as it used to, but it's not my favorite.
User avatar
Tao
Posts: 909
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:37 pm
Location: All over the place

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Tao »

I always saw the first verse as directed to God and the other two to each other. I don't see much of a problem.

The hymns that irrationally get under my skin are #250 We Are All Enlisted and #116 Come, Follow Me. Grrr.
He who knows others is clever;
He who knows himself has discernment.
He who overcomes others has force;
He who overcomes himself is strong. 33:1-4
Katya
Board Board Patron Saint
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:40 am
Location: Utah

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Katya »

Wisteria wrote:I always cringed a little at the end of the second and third verses. I get that "the wicked who fight against Zion shall surely be smitten at last" probably has a different connotation to someone who's been attacked by mobs, but it always sounded a little petulant to me.
Are you familiar with the original anti-Illinois verse in "Praise to the Man"?
wired
Posts: 483
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:30 am

Re: Hymn #19

Post by wired »

Tao wrote:The hymns that irrationally get under my skin are #250 We Are All Enlisted and #116 Come, Follow Me. Grrr.
I'll bite. Why do those get under your skin? (Especially Come Follow Me?)

I think we can all objectively conclude that In Our Lovely Deseret is the worst hymn of all time.
Craig Jessop
Pulchritudinous
Posts: 1300
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:55 pm

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Craig Jessop »

I admit I don't lik Come Follow Me or Sweet Hour of Prayer. They're easy to play so we sing them far too often, thus part of the reason I always volunteer to play at church, firesides, you name it, just so we don't have to sing an old standby like those. Nothing against them, of course, just seminary was four long years of Come Follow Me.

On a side note, I hate when I'm asked to play for a meeting and the conducting officer asks me to choose the hymn. I can play anything out of the hymnbook, so I wish they would spare me the agony of choosing a hymn that people are familiar with, but not at Choose the Right level of overplayed. The next time someone asks me, I might just choose Lean on My Ample Arm, or Sons of Michael He Approaches.
NerdGirl
President of the Lutheran Sisterhood Gun Club
Posts: 1810
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:41 am
Location: Calgary

Re: Hymn #19

Post by NerdGirl »

I have happy and sad faces in my tiny hymn book next to the hymns I like and the hymns I don't like.
Foreman
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:31 am

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Foreman »

Katya wrote:
Wisteria wrote:I always cringed a little at the end of the second and third verses. I get that "the wicked who fight against Zion shall surely be smitten at last" probably has a different connotation to someone who's been attacked by mobs, but it always sounded a little petulant to me.
Are you familiar with the original anti-Illinois verse in "Praise to the Man"?
I've always thought that the last verse of "Praise to the Man" sounded vaguely threatening...if there's an additional verse that actually is, I would be interested to hear about it.

Side note: we once took an Irish-Aussie-American transplant to see the Joseph Smith movie at my mission's Visitors' Center. Afterward, we asked how he liked it. "It was really good...but why were they playing Scotland the Brave at the end?" It was great.
User avatar
Unit of Energy
Title Bar Moderator
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:35 pm
Location: Planet Earth...I think.
Contact:

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Unit of Energy »

There wasn't an additional verse to Praise to the Man, it was the last two or three lines of the fourth verse.
Gimgimno
Cotton-headed Ninny-muggins
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 1:36 am

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Gimgimno »

Yeah, the altered text of the second verse doesn't really fit perfectly, but it's much more diplomatic and...tactful than the original verse.
Last edited by Gimgimno on Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Yellow
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:21 pm

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Yellow »

wired wrote:I think we can all objectively conclude that In Our Lovely Deseret is the worst hymn of all time.
It's much, much more interesting when played in minor. I call it "In Our Mournful Deseret". Still need to come up with words, though.
Gimgimno
Cotton-headed Ninny-muggins
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 1:36 am

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Gimgimno »

Original Second Verse wrote:Praise to his mem'ry, he died as a martyr,
Honored and blest be his ever great name!
Long shall his blood, which was shed by assassins,
Stain Illinois, while the earth lauds his fame.
User avatar
Laser Jock
Tech Admin
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Laser Jock »

Yellow wrote:
wired wrote:I think we can all objectively conclude that In Our Lovely Deseret is the worst hymn of all time.
It's much, much more interesting when played in minor. I call it "In Our Mournful Deseret". Still need to come up with words, though.
As someone who's heard Yellow's minor rendition, I agree. It's much better than the original.
Katya
Board Board Patron Saint
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:40 am
Location: Utah

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Katya »

Gimgimno wrote:
Original Second Verse wrote:Praise to his mem'ry, he died as a martyr,
Honored and blest be his ever great name!
Long shall his blood, which was shed by assassins,
Stain Illinois, while the earth lauds his fame.
I was living in Illinois when I first learned about this verse, so my reaction was "No! Don't hurt Illinois!"
User avatar
Tao
Posts: 909
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:37 pm
Location: All over the place

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Tao »

wired wrote:I'll bite. Why do those get under your skin? (Especially Come Follow Me?)

I think we can all objectively conclude that In Our Lovely Deseret is the worst hymn of all time.

Come Follow Me verse 3:
"Is it enough alone to know
That we must follow him [here] below
While trav'ling through this vale of tears?
No, this extends to holier spheres."

Great fine and wonderful. On to verse 4:

"Not only shall we emulate
His course while in this earthly state,
But when we're freed from present cares,
If with our Lord we would be heirs."

If what? It's saying not only should we follow Christ, but if we want to be heirs.... thank you for that lovely song, now it is time for the prayer. Grrrr.

I think for the hundreds of times I've sung this song, I've actually gone on to verse 5 once.

"We must the onward path pursue
As wider fields expand to view,
And follow him unceasingly,
Whate'er our lot or sphere may be."

Look! The other half of the thought! What an idea! Either end at 3 or at least go till 5. But the page break hits at 4 and apparently no one really cares what it is we sing.

We Are All Enlisted is more a personal arguement with the rhyme scheme, really.

Fill in the blank:

We are all enlisted till the conflict is o’er;
Happy are we! Happy are we!
Soldiers in the army, there’s a bright crown in store;
We shall win and wear it by and by.
Haste to the battle, quick to the field;
Truth is our helmet, buckler, and shield.
Stand by our colors; proudly they wave!
We’re joyfully, joyfully marching to our _____.

On a similar note, I was touched to hear a group of Marines sing the original Battle Hymn of the Republic: "As He died to make men holy, let us die to make men free"
User avatar
Tao
Posts: 909
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:37 pm
Location: All over the place

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Tao »

And you're right about In Our Lovely Deseret, I think I was scarred as a child: Bark! Bark! Bark! 'Tis children's music....
User avatar
Marduk
Most Attractive Mod
Posts: 2995
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Orem, UT
Contact:

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Marduk »

Tao wrote:
"Not only shall we emulate
His course while in this earthly state,
But when we're freed from present cares,
If with our Lord we would be heirs."
This is actually a complete thought without verse 5. It is moving the sentence structure around utilizing poetic license, so the if/then format becomes a then/if format. In other words, we should emulate his course in this earthly state as well as when we're freed from present cares if we want to be heirs with our Lord.
Deus ab veritas
Gimgimno
Cotton-headed Ninny-muggins
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 1:36 am

Re: Hymn #19

Post by Gimgimno »

Tao wrote:We are all enlisted till the conflict is o’er;
Happy are we! Happy are we!
Soldiers in the army, there’s a bright crown in store;
We shall win and wear it by and by.
Haste to the battle, quick to the field;
Truth is our helmet, buckler, and shield.
Stand by our colors; proudly they wave!
We’re joyfully, joyfully marching to our _____.
When this song was originally written in 88,000,000 B.C., it was "joyfully marching to our cave." However, many years have passed since then, so they opted to change it to the more correct "home" rather than preserve the original rhyme scheme.
Post Reply