Page 2 of 2
Re: Girls.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:42 am
by Craig Jessop
Probably for a male, too. I mean, think about it. There would be nothing worse than a motorcycling, chaps clad woman hungering for your flesh, especially in a non-lusty way.
Re: Girls.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:53 pm
by Laser Jock
Craig Jessop wrote:Probably for a male, too. I mean, think about it. There would be nothing worse than a motorcycling, chaps clad woman hungering for your flesh, especially in a non-lusty way.
Man. It'd been a few days since this thread was updated, so when I saw your post I couldn't remember any context for the thread at all. (And your post happened to be at the top of a new page.) It was confusing, to say the least.
Re: Girls.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:20 pm
by Dragon Lady
Laser Jock wrote:Craig Jessop wrote:Probably for a male, too. I mean, think about it. There would be nothing worse than a motorcycling, chaps clad woman hungering for your flesh, especially in a non-lusty way.
Man. It'd been a few days since this thread was updated, so when I saw your post I couldn't remember any context for the thread at all. (And your post happened to be at the top of a new page.) It was confusing, to say the least.
Seconded.
Re: Girls.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:13 pm
by Wisteria
But it would make for a great title bar.