Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:08 am
by Fredjikrang
Hehehe, what can I say. I'm a professional fence sitter. :D

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:10 am
by xkcd ***
Personally, I think that would be a little uncomfortable.

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:12 am
by Fredjikrang
Depends on the fence. I once slept on top of a block wall fence (no really, I did.) It wasn't too bad. :)

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:14 am
by Nanti-SARRMM
xkcd *** wrote:Personally, I think that would be a little uncomfortable.
Only if there is a security camera looking at you with federal agents in their jeep waiting below to apprehend you as you decide to get off the fence

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:16 am
by xkcd ***
Nanti-SARRMM wrote:
xkcd *** wrote:Personally, I think that would be a little uncomfortable.
Only if there is a security camera looking at you with federal agents in their jeep waiting below to apprehend you as you decide to get off the fence
I was really just thinking of those picket fences, or the metal ones with the wires. It wouldn't feel too good for your behind.

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:21 am
by Nanti-SARRMM
xkcd *** wrote:
I was really just thinking of those picket fences, or the metal ones with the wires. It wouldn't feel too good for your behind.
True, but depends on the thickness of your pants, and if you randomly have reinforced steel string pants. (Like the ones Gretchen gave Mikey in Recess when his tore)

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:24 am
by xkcd ***
Nanti-SARRMM wrote:
xkcd *** wrote:
I was really just thinking of those picket fences, or the metal ones with the wires. It wouldn't feel too good for your behind.
True, but depends on the thickness of your pants, and if you randomly have reinforced steel string pants. (Like the ones Gretchen gave Mikey in Recess when his tore)
I loved Recess. However, that only seems to fix the tearing problem, not the comfort problem. I think the only fence I could handle are those thick concrete ones, but then I think that's when they become walls.

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:28 am
by Nanti-SARRMM
xkcd *** wrote:
I loved Recess. However, that only seems to fix the tearing problem, not the comfort problem. I think the only fence I could handle are those thick concrete ones, but then I think that's when they become walls.
Well there is the type of fence that is in Fred's pic that would be easy to sit on as well.

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:37 am
by xkcd ***
Nanti-SARRMM wrote: Well there is the type of fence that is in Fred's pic that would be easy to sit on as well.
Wow... I just looked at his picture... That makes a lot more sense now...

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:41 pm
by Werf_Must
xkcd *** wrote:
Nanti-SARRMM wrote:
xkcd *** wrote:
I was really just thinking of those picket fences, or the metal ones with the wires. It wouldn't feel too good for your behind.
True, but depends on the thickness of your pants, and if you randomly have reinforced steel string pants. (Like the ones Gretchen gave Mikey in Recess when his tore)
I loved Recess. However, that only seems to fix the tearing problem, not the comfort problem. I think the only fence I could handle are those thick concrete ones, but then I think that's when they become walls.
I miss Recess. It was such a cute show, but I haven't seen it on in forever

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:22 pm
by Giovanni Schwartz
I love how our topics stay so well on topic all the time.

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:27 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
There. I voted. And it looks like I broke a tie.

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:39 pm
by Werf_Must
Anyone who voted no is just wrong. The answer is obviously yes!

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:40 pm
by Random
Werf_Must wrote:Anyone who voted no is just wrong. The answer is obviously yes!
Wait, I thought the answer was 47....

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:43 pm
by Werf_Must
Random wrote:
Werf_Must wrote:Anyone who voted no is just wrong. The answer is obviously yes!
Wait, I thought the answer was 47....
You mean 42? The Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything?

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:26 pm
by Fredjikrang
And the great debate continues. . .

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:24 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
Werf_Must wrote:
Random wrote:
Werf_Must wrote:Anyone who voted no is just wrong. The answer is obviously yes!
Wait, I thought the answer was 47....
You mean 42? The Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything?
No, she did actually mean 47. It's a long story.

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:57 pm
by Giovanni Schwartz
I bet TheAnswerIs42 disagrees with those of you who say the answer is 47.