Humor will not be tolerated!! -Portia

D'artagnan wrote: I accept your apology, on the condition that you don't make fun of my twitterpation with/of Goober.

Rofl!!!! I am laughing way too much today. Sure, I accept those conditions.

Does your spelling mean you are twitter friends with Goober, or did you mean twiderpation? (I'm not even sure how it is spelt.)

Nanti-SARRMM wrote:

D'artagnan wrote: I accept your apology, on the condition that you don't make fun of my twitterpation with/of Goober.

Rofl!!!! I am laughing way too much today. Sure, I accept those conditions.

Does your spelling mean you are twitter friends with Goober, or did you mean twiderpation? (I'm not even sure how it is spelt.)

Hmmn. You raise a good question, my just ended rival. I think I need a twitter account though first for that to apply. So it shall soon be both.

I used the word "obfuscated" today on a short answer question on a test.

You know... In my opinion this all seems strange. You know, like you're watching a movie and theres a great conflict, and you miss out on the rest of the movie and see the end where everyone is friends or the conflict is resolved, it just lacks. It feels like the same is going on here, that it is just forced politeness and nothing more.
I am not trying to say that our efforts aren't good, but more, I dunno, false? Or rushed at least. It's good that you want us all to get along Bob, and I admire that, and I will be polite, but beyond that, it just seems to me that all this is fake.

Dear bob,

Am I allowed to read your blog? Or at least have an invitation theretofore?

Yours truly,
Gio

Giovanni Schwartz wrote:Dear bob,

Am I allowed to read your blog? Or at least have an invitation theretofore?

Yours truly,
Gio

Any particular reason why you're asking for permission?

Because apparently she made it private recently. I clicked on the link from your blog, and it said I wasn't invited. *sniff*

Grr... She logged off. Either that, or someone conveniently showed up as a guset at the same time that her "Active in the last 15 minutes" was up.

Giovanni Schwartz wrote:Because apparently she made it private recently. I clicked on the link from your blog, and it said I wasn't invited. *sniff*

Neither am I. Sadness. Maybe this means she is a board writer now and does not want us to see her rejoicing?

I'm not allowed either. Maybe she just barley decided to block it and hasn't added anyone yet. Hopefully. I really enjoy reading her blog.

Or something. I hope she still lets me read it.

Well, while you're waiting, you can always read mine....

(shameless plug here)

She's blocked her book blog too.

Nanti-SARRMM wrote:You know... In my opinion this all seems strange. You know, like you're watching a movie and theres a great conflict, and you miss out on the rest of the movie and see the end where everyone is friends or the conflict is resolved, it just lacks. It feels like the same is going on here, that it is just forced politeness and nothing more.
I am not trying to say that our efforts aren't good, but more, I dunno, false? Or rushed at least. It's good that you want us all to get along Bob, and I admire that, and I will be polite, but beyond that, it just seems to me that all this is fake.

Don't be a drama mama, honeybums (typo, but keeping it).

SWKT Parachuter wrote:

Nanti-SARRMM wrote:You know... In my opinion this all seems strange. You know, like you're watching a movie and theres a great conflict, and you miss out on the rest of the movie and see the end where everyone is friends or the conflict is resolved, it just lacks. It feels like the same is going on here, that it is just forced politeness and nothing more.
I am not trying to say that our efforts aren't good, but more, I dunno, false? Or rushed at least. It's good that you want us all to get along Bob, and I admire that, and I will be polite, but beyond that, it just seems to me that all this is fake.

Don't be a drama mama, honeybums (typo, but keeping it).

Almost. I was almost right about what you would comment on. You should be on more often.

SWKT Parachuter wrote: Don't be a drama mama, honeybums (typo, but keeping it).

Comrade! Welcome. I am the slightly reformed D'artagnan now. Nice Jab.

SWKT Parachuter wrote: Don't be a drama mama, honeybums (typo, but keeping it).

You know what, you're right. I shouldn't be worrying about a small thing like this, I mean there is the tumbling economy, two corrupt politicians, as usual, running for office, Russian aggression, middle eastern aggression, classes, local election, and many other things that genuinely need to be worried about. Thank you for that clarification.

Nanti-SARRMM wrote:

SWKT Parachuter wrote: Don't be a drama mama, honeybums (typo, but keeping it).

You know what, you're right. I shouldn't be worrying about a small thing like this, I mean there is the tumbling economy, two corrupt politicians, as usual, running for office, Russian aggression, middle eastern aggression, classes, local election, and many other things that genuinely need to be worried about. Thank you for that clarification.

More melodramatics? You're either just being silly, which is probably the case, or... I dunno. But why though? Am I correct in guessing that you say inane things to get SWKT here and be snarky to you? I mean come on, not everything you say can be purposely inane.

So SWKT, I hope you can see through this too.

D'artagnan wrote: More melodramatics? You're either just being silly, which is probably the case, or... I dunno. But why though? Am I correct in guessing that you say inane things to get SWKT here and be snarky to you? I mean come on, not everything you say can be purposely inane.

Aardvark.

My ipod loaded without any problems this morning. It made me happy.