I was going to make a thread for this, but then I saw this thread, which I think will do just as well.
When I read Ƥ. Ɗ. Kirĸe's response to #52885 (I'll call the question "Ward Social"), I couldn't help but be a little bit. . . disgusted by his outlook on it. I thoroughly disagree with his outlook on being social, in general, and am most vehemently against his last paragraph. He says,
So if you insist on pursuing popularity within your ward then I can’t much improve on your suggestion to just spend more time at it, but carefully consider what you want from your social life before you worry too much about superficial popularity in your ward, eh? Do try to make a handful of close friends and do be pleasant to your ward, but don't worry about popularity. Works well enough for me.
Now, first off, I do agree with some of his advice here. Especially where he says "don't worry about popularity." I think that that is probably the soundest advice that he gave in his answer. The rest of the paragraph, and answer, I have some real issues with.
Problem 1: Answer the question. The question is asking for advice on how to become better at holding conversations. The majority of Ƥ. Ɗ. Kirĸe's response is a very logic based approach to social life, barely even touching on conversations.
Problem 2: Attitude of popularity. I very much dislike Ƥ. Ɗ. Kirĸe's tone with regard to popularity. He makes it sound like "popularity" is a terrible thing, that is only achieved by lying and scheming. I don't know where Ƥ. Ɗ. Kirĸe has been living, but I haven't seen much of that kind of popularity since high school. Maybe I have been lucky but I have found that everywhere that I have lived here at BYU the majority of the ward members have been more than mature enough to realize the idiocy of
trying to become popular. In addition to that, everyone I have come across that is popular in those wards have been so because they are nice people who really do get along with most everyone. They are people that are honestly, deeper than surface level small talk, interested in the people around them. In fact, they tend to be selfless and charitable almost to a fault, using large amounts of their free time and energy to help those around them, in one way or another.
Problem 3: Social goals. I agree with Ƥ. Ɗ. Kirĸe's response in that I think that it is good to have goals in your life, and social goals are no exception. However, I honestly think that Ƥ. Ɗ. Kirĸe's goals, at least as they came across to me in his answer, are not quite what I would call ideal. He gives goals of being agreeable, and maintaining a close circle of friends. Both good goals, but I think that they are looking in the wrong place. I think that a better goal would be to come to care about those around you, and let it go from there.
Now, I am by no means a social expert. In fact, before this calendar year I stunk hard core at pretty much anything to do with social niceties. But I think that I have learned at least one thing. Being outgoing and a "social success," if you will, is all about caring. People can tell when you don't really care about them. They can tell when you are just fulfilling the most basic social graces of saying hello and asking how they are. And doing those things won't accomplish anything. It won't set off any kind of spark, it would make you stick in their memory. But if you can truly come to care about the people around you, then you will become more outgoing. You will become better at holding conversations. It takes a while, as I am still learning, but I think that that is the key. It is the common thread that I have noticed among those "social giants" that I have gotten to know.