Page 1 of 1

#55618, or maybe #55069, Stale Board?

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:56 pm
by vorpal blade
I've found the Board to be very entertaining lately.

#55069, about facts of each of the 100 Typing Monkeys, was particularly clever and hilarious. It made me wonder who the author really is. I imagine a lot of work went into that answer, and I would like the author to know I really appreciated it.

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:16 pm
by NerdGirl
I also think the Board has been really good lately. Good questions, and good answers. The one thing that does have me a bit worried is that the number of questions seemed to be going down for a while (but I think it's starting to pick up again). That just makes me worry a bit that our "instant gratification" culture has started to make people less interested in submitting questions to a board that takes 100 hours to answer them. I just hope enough people keep sending in questions to keep the Board going for quite a few more years. Part of the whole appeal of the Board for me is the waiting for an answer. It's nice to have something to look forward to. :)

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:39 pm
by NerdGirl
And today's horcrux question was further evidence of the continued awesomeness of the 100 Hour Board.

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:06 pm
by C is for
100 Typing Monkeys have an account here on the message board! You could send them a PM or email. Here's the email address listed:

100TypingMonkeys (at) gmail com

It probably forwards to the address of the author.

Re: #55618, or maybe #55069, Stale Board?

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:25 pm
by 100 Typing Monkeys
vorpal blade wrote:I've found the Board to be very entertaining lately.

#55069, about facts of each of the 100 Typing Monkeys, was particularly clever and hilarious. It made me wonder who the author really is.
Thank you very much. #100 was the primary compiler of the facts listed.

It's always good to know that lengthy answers get read by someone, despite what #92 thought.

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:50 pm
by vorpal blade
Wow! I wasn't expecting this.

Thank you #100.

Yes, #92 was too pessimistic. And, speaking of #92, I'm glad #39 found out. :)