Page 1 of 1
Kammerjunker
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:19 pm
by Emiliana
It seems that a Kammerjunker (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kammerjunker_%28biscuit%29) is a type of biscuit (cookie) popular in Denmark. The word "kammerjunker," however, is also German for a type of valet or gentleman-in-waiting (
http://www.dict.cc/german-english/Kammerjunker.html and
http://www.englishforums.com/English/Ka ... x/post.htm). Anyone know what the connection is? (I'm kind of looking at you, Katya, as the person who seems most likely to know this.)
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:29 pm
by Dragon Lady
I really, really expected this to be spam. That is all.
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:42 pm
by Katya
OK. The German bit it pretty straightforward. "Kammer" means "chamber" (they actually have the same root) and a "Junker" is a "squire." So, in the same way that we say "chambermaid" in English, the Germans apparently say "chambersquire."
The Danish part . . . I'm more confused about. It's a loanword from German (the native Danish word for "valet" is "kammertjener") and it can mean either a cookie or an obsolete title for the nobility. So, I'm guessing the history of the word is: German compound noun (chamber + squire) -> German loanword to Danish (with roughly the same meaning) -> Danish word becomes slang for a kind of cookie. It's this last leap that has me stumped, since slang or colloquial terms can have very unusual etymologies.
Dragon Lady wrote:I really, really expected this to be spam. That is all.
So, she posted 200+ real comments so that she could finally spam us? Well played, madam. Well played.
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:55 pm
by Dragon Lady
Psh. I meant when I saw the title of the thread and the links in the first post. It seemed spammish. And then I saw who posted it, which is how I knew it wasn't spam. Silly, silly Katya.
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:57 pm
by Katya
Dragon Lady wrote:Psh. I meant when I saw the title of the thread and the links in the first post. It seemed spammish. And then I saw who posted it, which is how I knew it wasn't spam. Silly, silly Katya.
No, I think you're on to something.
TRUST NO ONE. 
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:59 pm
by Rifka
Dragon Lady wrote:I really, really expected this to be spam. That is all.
Me too!
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:38 pm
by Dead Cat
Rifka wrote:Dragon Lady wrote:I really, really expected this to be spam. That is all.
Me too!
Ditto.
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:16 pm
by Marduk
I did not.
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:19 am
by Emiliana
Oh Katya, I want to be just like you when I grow up.
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:20 am
by Katya
Emiliana wrote:Oh Katya, I want to be just like you when I grow up.
For my germanic etymological skills or my latent paranoia? (Or both?

)
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:40 pm
by Emiliana
Katya wrote:Emiliana wrote:Oh Katya, I want to be just like you when I grow up.
For my germanic etymological skills or my latent paranoia? (Or both?

)
Mostly the first. I find the second skill somewhat less admirable, maybe because I already share it...
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:34 pm
by Marduk
Personally, I'd be less paranoid if those people out there would stop watching me and plotting.
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:10 am
by Tao
Katya wrote:Emiliana wrote:Oh Katya, I want to be just like you when I grow up.
For my germanic etymological skills or my latent paranoia? (Or both?

)
The question is: did the former arise from the latter? Or was it the other way around?
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 8:11 pm
by Wisteria
Heh. I like everything in this thread. And I'm a little disappointed that no one has postulated further on Tao's excellent question.
Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 8:39 pm
by Katya
Tao wrote:Katya wrote:Emiliana wrote:Oh Katya, I want to be just like you when I grow up.
For my germanic etymological skills or my latent paranoia? (Or both?

)
The question is: did the former arise from the latter? Or was it the other way around?
Correlation does not imply causation.

Re: Kammerjunker
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:52 am
by Indefinite Integral
Katya wrote:Correlation does not imply causation.

That reminded me of
this