Aww, you know I don’t think I’m smarter or superior to gay people.
My estimate of the majority comes from searching gay blogs and reading life stories, many of which were written by ex-gays. So my impression may be skewed. Do you have better data?
I’m not sure what you are trying to say in your first paragraph. Assuming you aren’t just mocking me I’ll give you a straight (and gay) answer.
I don’t know if anyone is “hopelessly” anything, but many find change to be very, very difficult. In my readings and conversations with those who have been molested I find the subject very complex and involves many factors. Molestation leads to different results depending on such things as the resilience of the child, the manner and frequency of the molestation, what the child thinks happened, the level of fear experienced, the level of trust involved, and the reaction of family and friends. Probably more factors than that. Sexual molestation is always harmful and traumatic, but most people survive a single molestation without becoming gay because of fear/anger towards men (as TBS points out is one theory) or becoming “hopelessly straight.” I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that most molested children have issues about sex.
Sexual molestation of children is exploitation, and there may be great anger and resentment later when the child begins to understand what happened from an adult perspective. But the molestation may be either violent or seductive in nature. When seductive the child is left with a sense of being complicit in the molestation, especially if the seduction was accompanied by feelings of pleasure, gratitude for being “loved” or thought special, arousal through the use of pornography, and gifts given to “woo” the victim. If not corrected the child may develop a sexual orientation toward the perpetrator of the seduction molestation.
Violent molestation will probably bring a more immediate reaction of anger, hurt, and feelings of being violated. Yet you cannot always predict what the outcome will be when the innocence of childhood is shattered. Some violently molested become heterosexually promiscuous.
TBS is right that correlation does not imply causation. It is a little difficult to prove, however, because today we could never permit molestation of children as an experiment in order to see if we could statistically increase the number of children who later become identified as gay. So, how can we ever prove causation?
If we go back in history we find that just such an “experiment” was conducted. I came across this fact when involved in a long (daily, for months) online discussion with a couple of smart gay people and others. By the way, both of the gay people had been molested as children. One of the things that came out of the discussion was that the gay guy yearned for the golden age when 100% of the men were gay. I didn’t believe that such a time ever existed. He insisted that it did in ancient Greece, and he offered references to many history books to prove it. So I read a lot about it, not just from history books he suggested, but other history books. It turns out the smart gay guy was right and I was wrong, for at least the free class of Greek men.
Will Durant in his “The Story of Civilization: II The Life of Greece” spells it all out. The way it was done was like this. At the age of six a boy in ancient Greece was taken from his family and put in a dormitory with men and boys. A boy had to have a mentor/lover in order to survive. The men showered gifts, poetry, praise, attention and favors on the boy until the boy selected one of them as his lover. In essence it was institutional molestation by seduction. As far as history records 100% of them develop same-sex attraction, preferring sex with other men or boys to sex with women. The government had to provide many tax and other incentives to get the men interested enough in sex with women to prevent a total collapse in the population.
That’s what we read in the history books.
And just to be clear, I’m not saying that a gay man today is more likely to be a child molester than a “straight” man.