Page 1 of 1

Favorite March 17-22

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:11 pm
by bobtheenchantedone

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:19 am
by Cognoscente
Tao finally answering the whistle question was monumental, yes, but RP's movie answer made me laugh and cheer. Props.

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:39 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
I especially loved his response to 'a pox upon your house.' That, and the quote in the question title, are the main reasons for me choosing that answer.

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:56 am
by Portia
"Excellent fondling and groping skills" was so incredibly inappropriate* that it was pretty much guaranteed to get my vote. That, and I could read it one sitting.

Though monkey #23 is pretty funny . . . haha

*in general, not for the answer.

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:34 am
by Benvolio
Booo, monkeys! I'm over the playing cards. Funny once, not funny twice.

I voted for the fun with languages one. It was quick to read. Less is definitely more.

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:23 pm
by 100 Typing Monkeys
Benvolio wrote:Booo, monkeys! I'm over the playing cards. Funny once, not funny twice.
Boo, Benvolio! We're over the...um...er...You're funny once...oh dear, that's not working either...

Boo, Bevolio!!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:04 pm
by ahem.
Okay, there are 100 of you, and you can't come up with a better comeback than that? I'm afraid I'm losing faith in your "Monkey overlords are good for humans" campaign.

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:34 pm
by 100 Typing Monkeys
ahem. wrote:Okay, there are 100 of you, and you can't come up with a better comeback than that? I'm afraid I'm losing faith in your "Monkey overlords are good for humans" campaign.
Perhaps you did not note that we added three additional exclamation points after our previous attempts at insults were stymied, thus making our comeback thrice as biting.

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:11 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
100 Typing Monkeys wrote:Perhaps you did not note that we added three additional exclamation points after our previous attempts at insults were stymied, thus making our comeback thrice as biting.
...supposedly.

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:19 pm
by Wisteria
The excellent Terry Pratchett somewhere (I believe in the book "Maskerade") defines a mobocracy's IQ as the lowest IQ of a mob member divided by the number of mob members. I'm not saying that 100 typing monkeys are a mob, but it does seem like their intellect is suffering just a touch . . . Pratchett also points out in "Reaper Man" that only deranged minds use four exclamation points at a time. I'm just sayin'.

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:36 am
by 100 Typing Monkeys
Wisteria wrote:The excellent Terry Pratchett somewhere (I believe in the book "Maskerade") defines a mobocracy's IQ as the lowest IQ of a mob member divided by the number of mob members. I'm not saying that 100 typing monkeys are a mob, but it does seem like their intellect is suffering just a touch . . . Pratchett also points out in "Reaper Man" that only deranged minds use four exclamation points at a time. I'm just sayin'.
It seems to us that the only thing Mr. Pratchett is excellent at is being stupid. SNAP! (we have determined by perusing sundry interweb discussion boards that "snap" is an appropriate exclamation after rendering a particularly powerful rejoinder)

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:36 am
by Fredjikrang
I prefer "BAM!" or, after an especially excellent comeback, "WABAM!"

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:45 pm
by Portia
I think there were too many question addressed to the Monkeys that posted yesterday.

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:56 pm
by 100 Typing Monkeys
Portia wrote:I think there were too many question addressed to the Monkeys that posted yesterday.
We quite agree, the questions just kept coming, and some of them were quite time intensive to write. But, what can we do? Readers don't know when four other readers have written us a question, so sometimes we're asked questions in bunches.

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:20 pm
by Craig Jessop
Good thing there's 100 of you then. Unless, of course, you combined only have the intelligence and strength of one human -- pretty pathetic, monkeys, pretty pathetic.

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:33 pm
by 100 Typing Monkeys
Craig Jessop wrote:Good thing there's 100 of you then. Unless, of course, you combined only have the intelligence and strength of one human -- pretty pathetic, monkeys, pretty pathetic.
Whoa, Mr. Jessop, we're not entirely certain we like the aspersions you are casting upon us. Rest assured that each of us is possessed of the wisdom of Solomon and the endurance of Atlas. But with such abilities come more rigorous standards. The need to meticulously draft our answers to the high standards all 100 of us maintain should not be deemed as evidence that we are equal to humans. If we slumped to human standards undoubtedly we could handle the entirety of the Board inbox.

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:42 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
"Oh, the Yellow Rose of Monkeys, that I'm a-goin' a see..."

Yeah, for some reason that's what popped into my head. I should quit getting on the message board during English class.

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:19 pm
by Dead Cat
100 Typing Monkeys wrote:Rest assured that each of us is possessed of the wisdom of Solomon
Except for #27, the glue sniffer.

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:21 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
I just realized that we have very few questions for tomorrow's poll. I should go back and look for some more.

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:48 pm
by 100 Typing Monkeys
Dead Cat wrote:
100 Typing Monkeys wrote:Rest assured that each of us is possessed of the wisdom of Solomon
Except for #27, the glue sniffer.
This is true. And in the interest of full disclosure, #23 is not overflowing with wisdom juice either. But the rest of us carry their load just fine. 98 monkeys with the wisdom of Solomon is nothing to raise your olfactory organ at.