Page 1 of 4
Who you think I am or aren't?
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:22 pm
by D'artagnan
I would also like to know why you think I am Sarrmmatical or not.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:25 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
I did think you were Sam, for about half a day. Then I thought differently.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:26 pm
by yellow m&m
I never thought you were Nanti. Your writing style is too different. Among other things.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:28 pm
by D'artagnan
bobtheenchantedone wrote:I did think you were Sam, for about half a day. Then I thought differently.
yellow m&m wrote:I never thought you were Nanti. Your writing style is too different. Among other things.
What other things Yellow M&M, and Ms. Enchantedone, may I know your reasoning as well. It is delightful to know that not all have jumped up to conclusions.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:29 pm
by Fredjikrang
I never thought you were Nanti.
I know that you are a BYU student, and I have my own guess about who you are.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:32 pm
by yellow m&m
Well, that private message you sent me was the biggest indicator.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:35 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
I'm afraid the existence of sqrt caused me to jump to the alter ego conclusion. After talking to orb and checking something online, I came to quite another conclusion.
And I'm a Miss, if that's not too much trouble.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:41 pm
by D'artagnan
bobtheenchantedone wrote:I'm afraid the existence of sqrt caused me to jump to the alter ego conclusion. After talking to orb and checking something online, I came to quite another conclusion.
And I'm a Miss, if that's not too much trouble.
Isn't miss ms.?
And what conclusion is that pray tell?
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:00 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
: P
And no, not really. For one thing, 'miss' sounds better than 'miz.' And 'miss' usually has an old-fashioned connotation.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:50 pm
by Giovanni Schwartz
I vote for other. I think that you ar eprobably someone else, but I'm not 100% positive about that yet.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:53 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
I want to know what mineral two people think he is.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:55 pm
by Giovanni Schwartz
Umm... Probably carbon. Because if the message board was a marshmallow, he would be the yucky carbon that gets on it after you bump the log in the fire.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:57 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
I have yet to believe that dear D'artagnan is all bad. Just saying, since everyone seems to be getting down.
I also didn't mind SWKT when he first started posting. Pattern? I hope not...
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:18 pm
by Nanti-SARRMM
bobtheenchantedone wrote:I have yet to believe that dear D'artagnan is all bad. Just saying, since everyone seems to be getting down.
I think there is some good inside as well, he just needs to get past all that cynicism.
Anyways, here's hoping that he acts like the true musketeer that he has named himself of.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:01 pm
by Giovanni Schwartz
Another reason for him being someone's alter ego: His location is listed as 17th century France. But points for him not being someone else to: He called bob Ms. Enchantedone instead of bob, and he called SAM something else instead of Sam. But I still vote for him being an alter ego.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:31 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
Giovanni Schwartz wrote:Another reason for him being someone's alter ego: His location is listed as 17th century France. But points for him not being someone else to: He called bob Ms. Enchantedone instead of bob, and he called SAM something else instead of Sam. But I still vote for him being an alter ego.
Personally, listed as being in 17th century France gives him creativity points, not proof that he's someone's alter ego.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:37 pm
by Giovanni Schwartz
Yeah... But unless you're familiar with the Boardiopia, you're not going to be creative with your location.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:39 pm
by bobtheenchantedone
Giovanni Schwartz wrote:Yeah... But unless you're familiar with the Boardiopia, you're not going to be creative with your location.
?
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:14 pm
by Goober
bobtheenchantedone wrote:Giovanni Schwartz wrote:Yeah... But unless you're familiar with the Boardiopia, you're not going to be creative with your location.
?
not true.
There are plenty of people who have been creative.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:38 pm
by Nanti-SARRMM
Giovanni Schwartz wrote:Yeah... But unless you're familiar with the Boardiopia, you're not going to be creative with your location.
Dude. Boardiopia? We have our own geography now? You do realize that my location is real, correct? That's just an example of creativity and it has nothing to do with the board. It's fact. A sad fact that it exists, but nonetheless is still completely true.