Top Ten

orb360 · Post by **orb360** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:54 pm

You have leveled up in Posting!

You gain +1 Flamebait!
You gain +1 Intelligence!
You gain +5 Wisdom!

chillygator · Post by **chillygator** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:57 pm

Dear bismark,

Next time I see you, I am going to smack you. Only you're not allowed to smack back because I will be justified. Those are the rules.

Post by **bobtheenchantedone** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:03 pm

I could delete those, dear bismark...

Giovanni Schwartz · Post by **Giovanni Schwartz** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:09 pm

Do it! Do it! Do it! (That was more of a chant than an exclamation.)

bismark · Post by **bismark** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:09 pm

you could, but since there is an obvious conflict of interest in you doing so, i think its best if you dont. especially since i am very proud of them.

Post by **bobtheenchantedone** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:14 pm

I suppose if you are very proud of them...

Giovanni Schwartz · Post by **Giovanni Schwartz** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:19 pm

Oh come on... Bisnark isn't that cool.

bismark · Post by **bismark** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:24 pm

who is Bisnark? (+1)

Fredjikrang · Post by **Fredjikrang** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:24 pm

I would delete them, but Orb's response is far too classic.

bismark · Post by **bismark** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:25 pm

conflicts of interest all over the place. i demand that moderators no longer be allowed to take part in the top 10 competition. (+1)

Nanti-SARRMM · Post by **Nanti-SARRMM** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:28 pm

bismark wrote:conflicts of interest all over the place. i demand that moderators no longer be allowed to take part in the top 10 competition. (+1)

Then that qualifies me as number 1 then! Victory is mine!

orb360 · Post by **orb360** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:29 pm

Fredjikrang wrote:I would delete them, but Orb's response is far too classic.

Why thank you!

I just couldn't stop myself...

Fredjikrang · Post by **Fredjikrang** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:30 pm

You know, if we really cared, we could just quietly delete accounts of those approaching our count. . .

Nanti-SARRMM · Post by **Nanti-SARRMM** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:33 pm

Fredjikrang wrote:You know, if we really cared, we could just quietly delete accounts of those approaching our count. . .

Wait... we're in communist China now? Bad Fred. No envoking the secret police!

Post by **bobtheenchantedone** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:35 pm

bismark wrote:conflicts of interest all over the place. i demand that moderators no longer be allowed to take part in the top 10 competition. (+1)

: P

Giovanni Schwartz · Post by **Giovanni Schwartz** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:46 pm

bismark+snarky=Bisnark.

The "Typo" was intentional.

chillygator · Post by **chillygator** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:52 pm

Giovanni Schwartz wrote:bismark+snarky=Bisnark.

The "Typo" was intentional.

neither "bismark" nor "snarky" were capitalized, so where did the B come from?

Giovanni Schwartz · Post by **Giovanni Schwartz** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:55 pm

That was just to make bismark grumpy.

xkcd *** · Post by xkcd *** » Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:42 pm

I kinda like the new name.

Bisnark.