Randomness 4, Randomness Rebooted

Any miscellaneous posts can live here.
orb360
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:53 am

Post by orb360 »

Giovanni Schwartz wrote:I want a camer for Christmas this year. And a memory card. But I'm not sold on what memory card I want. Or what camera I want. But I want to keep the price combined under 400$, but still have enough memory to make good use of a 12 megapixel camera. Or am I totally mistaken, and it doesn't take any more to save a 12 mp camera than it does a 5 mp camera.[/url]
Dude... seriously...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6830120073


and then get just a normal lense for it
Everything below the line of coherence may be safely ignored.
User avatar
yellow m&m
The Yellow One
Posts: 649
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 10:01 am
Location: my parents attic
Contact:

Post by yellow m&m »

orb360 wrote:
Giovanni Schwartz wrote:I want a camera for Christmas this year. And a memory card. But I'm not sold on what memory card I want. Or what camera I want. But I want to keep the price combined under 400$, but still have enough memory to make good use of a 12 megapixel camera. Or am I totally mistaken, and it doesn't take any more to save a 12 mp camera than it does a 5 mp camera.[/url]
Dude... seriously...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6830120073


and then get just a normal lens for it
I agree. DSLR's are really nice. I mean it.
Staple guns: because duct tape can't make that "kaCHUNK" noise
User avatar
bobtheenchantedone
Forum Administrator
Posts: 4229
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:20 pm
Location: At work
Contact:

Post by bobtheenchantedone »

I very much like my camera and card, which were under $150. (Then again, I get a 30% discount...)
The Epistler was quite honestly knocked on her ethereal behind by the sheer logic of this.
User avatar
Giovanni Schwartz
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:41 pm

Post by Giovanni Schwartz »

But what happened to under $400?
orb360
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:53 am

Post by orb360 »

I have a Canon Powershot A640... I loaded CHDK on it and it's pretty good for a point and shoot (It's no SLR, but it still takes good pics...)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/orb360
Everything below the line of coherence may be safely ignored.
orb360
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:53 am

Post by orb360 »

Nice Twitterstorm earlier BTW.....
Everything below the line of coherence may be safely ignored.
User avatar
yellow m&m
The Yellow One
Posts: 649
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 10:01 am
Location: my parents attic
Contact:

Post by yellow m&m »

orb360 wrote:Nice Twitterstorm earlier BTW.....
I enjoyed it myself. It keeps me entertained while I wait for the homework to pile up.

Homework! Semester Premier tonight!
Staple guns: because duct tape can't make that "kaCHUNK" noise
Fredjikrang
Never Coming Back?
Posts: 2031
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:59 am
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

Post by Fredjikrang »

For anyone considering a point and shoot camera, don't go off of megapixels! Small cameras with a high megapixel count actually take worse pictures than those with a lower pixel count that came out at the same time.

I would suggest looking through some of the reviews at dpreview.com. They even have a nifty buying guide! The Fujifilm FinePix F40fd seems like a good fit. :)
[img]http://fredjikrang.petfish.net/Fence-banner.png[/img]
User avatar
Giovanni Schwartz
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:41 pm

Post by Giovanni Schwartz »

I'd like a camera that accepts standard American batteries with no charger, because I plan on taking it to Europe next summer.
Nanti-SARRMM
Posts: 1958
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:02 pm
Location: Beyond the Mountains of the Copper Miners into the Desert of Absolute Boredom
Contact:

Post by Nanti-SARRMM »

This is the camera I have.
This site, and the opinions and statements contained herein do not necessarily reflect on my sanity, or lack thereof.
Fredjikrang
Never Coming Back?
Posts: 2031
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:59 am
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

Post by Fredjikrang »

Most modern chargers are global, meaning they work anywhere.
[img]http://fredjikrang.petfish.net/Fence-banner.png[/img]
User avatar
Giovanni Schwartz
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:41 pm

Post by Giovanni Schwartz »

Are they? That's good news. Here's what I'm looking for, with a scale of 1-10 on importance:

Under 400$ [10] with memory card [8] and rechargable batteries [4], or at least one that doesn't eat batteries like popcorn [10] (preferrably AA, although that's still up in the air)
More than the 2x optical zoom my current camera has. [7]
More than the five megapixels my current camera has (I want something that will help me take advantage of all the beautiful Austrian things that I will see) [6]
A good LCD display that I can actually see [7]
Settings and effects to play with are fun, but not required. [4]
One that will hold a standard SD card [4], because that's what I've already got, although I would like on that is more than 256 MB like I have [10].
Other than that, do you guys have any recommendations on what I should want, and what number do they get?
Nanti-SARRMM
Posts: 1958
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:02 pm
Location: Beyond the Mountains of the Copper Miners into the Desert of Absolute Boredom
Contact:

Post by Nanti-SARRMM »

Look at the one I showed you. It is a bit bulky, but it is everything you described, or search newegg to find similar stuff.
This site, and the opinions and statements contained herein do not necessarily reflect on my sanity, or lack thereof.
Fredjikrang
Never Coming Back?
Posts: 2031
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:59 am
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

Post by Fredjikrang »

I would suggest any of these:

Canon PowerShot A720 IS ~$200 (2xAA battery, 8 Megapixel, 6x zoom, uses SD cards, 2.5" LCD, image stabilization, "Highly Recommended" by dpreview.com)
Canon Powershot SX110 IS ~$300 (2xAA battery, 9 Megapixel, 10x zoom, uses SD cards, 3" LCD, image stabilization)
[img]http://fredjikrang.petfish.net/Fence-banner.png[/img]
orb360
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:53 am

Post by orb360 »

Fredjikrang wrote:I would suggest any of these:

Canon PowerShot A720 IS ~$200 (2xAA battery, 8 Megapixel, 6x zoom, uses SD cards, 2.5" LCD, image stabilization, "Highly Recommended" by dpreview.com)
Canon Powershot SX110 IS ~$300 (2xAA battery, 9 Megapixel, 10x zoom, uses SD cards, 3" LCD, image stabilization)
And if you get a point-and-shoot Canon Powershot... be sure to install CHDK ( http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page )
Everything below the line of coherence may be safely ignored.
User avatar
xkcd ***
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: The spiritual BYU campus, but apparently not as Holy as BYU-I.
Contact:

Post by xkcd *** »

Did we ever figure out the longest time it took for a question to post?
But thick as you are, pay attention!
My words are a matter of Pride.

My Goal: To make enough money to hire Jeremy Irons, the voice of Scar from The Lion King, to follow me around and do my dialogue.
Nanti-SARRMM
Posts: 1958
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:02 pm
Location: Beyond the Mountains of the Copper Miners into the Desert of Absolute Boredom
Contact:

Post by Nanti-SARRMM »

xkcd *** wrote:Did we ever figure out the longest time it took for a question to post?
Wasn't it a few years for that one whistle question that Tao answered?
This site, and the opinions and statements contained herein do not necessarily reflect on my sanity, or lack thereof.
Fredjikrang
Never Coming Back?
Posts: 2031
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:59 am
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

Post by Fredjikrang »

Depends on how you define to to be answered. If it is time from asked to actually answered, it is probably the bell one.

If you mean which question was in the inbox for the longest, no idea, but I did have one go for well over 2000 hours once. I am pretty sure it wasn't the longest though.
[img]http://fredjikrang.petfish.net/Fence-banner.png[/img]
User avatar
xkcd ***
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: The spiritual BYU campus, but apparently not as Holy as BYU-I.
Contact:

Post by xkcd *** »

Nanti-SARRMM wrote:
xkcd *** wrote:Did we ever figure out the longest time it took for a question to post?
Wasn't it a few years for that one bell question that Tao answered?
No, I mean, not how long it took for an answer, but the time between the submission of the question and the post.
But thick as you are, pay attention!
My words are a matter of Pride.

My Goal: To make enough money to hire Jeremy Irons, the voice of Scar from The Lion King, to follow me around and do my dialogue.
User avatar
xkcd ***
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: The spiritual BYU campus, but apparently not as Holy as BYU-I.
Contact:

Post by xkcd *** »

Sorry Fred, didn't see your post.
But thick as you are, pay attention!
My words are a matter of Pride.

My Goal: To make enough money to hire Jeremy Irons, the voice of Scar from The Lion King, to follow me around and do my dialogue.
Post Reply