Preemptive Post: prosely[te/tize]

What do you think about the latest hot topic from the 100 Hour Board? Speak your piece here!

Moderator: Marduk

Post Reply
bismark
Old Man
Posts: 723
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:36 am
Contact:

Preemptive Post: prosely[te/tize]

Post by bismark »

Which is it: missionaries "proselyte" or missionaries "proselytize"? Is one *more* correct?
Discuss.
Yarjka
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

Post by Yarjka »

I think either one is correct. I prefer 'proselyte.' 'Proselytize' always sounded a little weird to me, but I'm becoming more used to it.
User avatar
Giovanni Schwartz
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:41 pm

Post by Giovanni Schwartz »

Missionaries proselytize.

Proselytes go on missions.

This according to the extremely trustworthy Wikipedia articles on each subject.
Yarjka
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

Post by Yarjka »

According to a quick search on Google News, "to proselytize" is much preferred to "to proselyte." 66 to 2. But that doesn't mean I have to think it sounds good to say it.
Gimgimno
Cotton-headed Ninny-muggins
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 1:36 am

Post by Gimgimno »

I say proselyting. I think proselytizing sounds ridiculous. I have a pet peeve when people say that they're disorientated instead of disoriented, and my preference in this case seems like a corollary to that (even though I know they're not very similar in actuality). It's a personal thing, I guess.
User avatar
Marduk
Most Attractive Mod
Posts: 2995
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Orem, UT
Contact:

Post by Marduk »

Proselytize is the correct and original form; as was pointed out, a proselyte is a "new convert". People have used the term incorrectly, and hence to "proselyte" has come into existence, but it is the late comer, not the original.
bismark
Old Man
Posts: 723
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:36 am
Contact:

Post by bismark »

thanks laser jock for taking the time to answer!
Post Reply