CATS is back!
Moderator: Marduk
Re: CATS is back!
Um, has no one noticed my signature over the past three days? More to come.
"If you don't put enough commas in, you won't know where to breathe and will die of asphyxiation"
--Jasper Fforde
--Jasper Fforde
- TheBlackSheep
- The Best
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:42 pm
- Location: Salt Lake County
Re: CATS is back!
Well, in any case, that solves the mystery of who D.A.R.E. is.
I hope you are who I think you are!
I hope you are who I think you are!
Re: CATS is back!
Oddly enough, I had noticed it.Dead Cat wrote:Um, has no one noticed my signature over the past three days? More to come.
Good old CATS.
- Dragon Lady
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:07 pm
- Location: Riverton, UT
Re: CATS is back!
I had noticed, too. And TBS explains why CATS is now CATS. But where I had insider info on that (and know more as to the why), I decided to just not say anything about it.ahem. wrote:Oddly enough, I had noticed it.Dead Cat wrote:Um, has no one noticed my signature over the past three days? More to come.
Good old CATS.
Re: CATS is back!
I feel like you all know something I don't know ... Which writer is CATS?
-
Craig Jessop
- Pulchritudinous
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:55 pm
Re: CATS is back!
It was Optimistic. back in the day.
- 100 Typing Monkeys
- Board Writer
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:04 pm
Re: CATS is back!
NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
- Dragon Lady
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:07 pm
- Location: Riverton, UT
Re: CATS is back!
And Optimistic. ALWAYS has a . at the end of his name.Craig Jessop wrote:It was Optimistic. back in the day.
- TheBlackSheep
- The Best
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:42 pm
- Location: Salt Lake County
Re: CATS is back!
I really am beyond thrilled about this.
-
Craig Jessop
- Pulchritudinous
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:55 pm
Re: CATS is back!
So who is Optimistic. now? I vote D.A.R.E.
- TheBlackSheep
- The Best
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:42 pm
- Location: Salt Lake County
Re: CATS is back!
Dude, I totally already said that. I noticed this a couple of days ago: http://theboard.byu.edu/aliases/7757/
Re: CATS is back!
Oh, fun! I don't know how I missed that back in the day.Craig Jessop wrote:It was Optimistic. back in the day.
- Humble Master
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:23 pm
Re: CATS is back!
It wasn't only Optimistic.
Re: CATS is back!
ok i thought i had this figured out and now i'm confused...
optimistic.=cats back in the day
d.a.r.e.=cats now
d.a.r.e.=optimistic.??
someone else=cats before optimistic??
optimistic.=cats back in the day
d.a.r.e.=cats now
d.a.r.e.=optimistic.??
someone else=cats before optimistic??
beautiful, dirty, rich
- Dragon Lady
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:07 pm
- Location: Riverton, UT
Re: CATS is back!
Close, but not quite. Change before to after.Imogen wrote:ok i thought i had this figured out and now i'm confused...
optimistic.=cats back in the day
d.a.r.e.=cats now
d.a.r.e.=optimistic.??
someone else=cats before optimistic??
Re: CATS is back!
ok so optimistic. was the first cats, then someone else was cats, now optimistic is cats again? maybe?
this beginning to feel too much like math for my drama major brain.
this beginning to feel too much like math for my drama major brain.
beautiful, dirty, rich
Re: CATS is back!
Yes, yes, and almost certainly yes.Imogen wrote:ok so optimistic. was the first cats, then someone else was cats, now optimistic is cats again?
- Laser Jock
- Tech Admin
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: CATS is back!
So, just curious...is everyone okay now with trying to publicly reveal/link writers? I thought that wasn't kosher, but perhaps I was wrong. Personally, I always felt like if people figured out our identities, that was part of the game, but making it public wasn't cool. (Several former writers apparently don't feel the same way, though.)
Re: CATS is back!
D.A.R.E.'s bio says he's a former writer, so I consider it fair game to guess.Laser Jock wrote:So, just curious...is everyone okay now with trying to publicly reveal/link writers?