True. Here's a new link from KSL: http://www.ksl.com/?sid=23667614&nid=15 ... id=queue-3 In the video the Church said it was too early to comment on the issue, since there's been no official policy change.Yarjka wrote:This is what I understand as well. This seems to be different than what was proposed earlier, in that the individual units will decide for themselves whether to accept gays or not.Laser Jock wrote:Also, as I understand it, the BSA is considering the possibility of allowing troops to decide for themselves. (The article thatonemom linked to doesn't seem to be available anymore, but this is what I heard on NPR, I think.) Thus, the Church would still be able to sponsor troops without contradicting their earlier statement at all ("If the appointment of scout leaders cannot be limited to those who live and affirm the sexual standards of BSA and its religious sponsors, the Scouting Movement as now constituted will cease to exist"), since they'd still be able to limit them if they so chose. Or so I understand it.
I could rant about my own personal reasons why I hope the Church will part ways with the Scouting program, but I'll spare everyone.
And thanks, Yarjka for posting about BSA v. Dale. Life got in the way of googling.