Page 1 of 1
The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:30 pm
by NerdGirl
...with my thesis advisor. I will probably ask several questions here over the next few months. Today's question is which of the following is correct?
1. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list".
2. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list."
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:38 pm
by C is for
It's begun to make a lot more sense to me to put the punctuation outside the quotation marks, but that's not what I learned in school. I have to consciously put the punctuation inside the quotation marks now, because I think that's what's correct. Unfortunately.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:46 pm
by Dragon Lady
The Heartless Siren (Board proofreader who doesn't read the boardboard) would tell you #2. I sometimes agree with her, but I think #1 can have its moments of appropriateness. Esp. if it's a question mark or exclamation point that is applicable to the sentence at large, but not what's in the quote. For example: Did he really just say, "I love her"? If you put the question mark inside the quotes, he's now not sure that he loves her. Which definitely changes the meaning.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:50 pm
by wired
Yeah, this is where grammar/punctuation thugs annoy me. The "correct" answer is that it should go inside the quotation marks, but the reality is that punctuation is a manmade construct that can be modified through popular usage in particular ways. Consequently, if it makes more sense to go outside of the quotation marks, we really ought not think we're constrained by "the rules." (Note that there, I didn't think putting the period inside of the quotation mark would cause any undue confusion and wasn't part of an actual quotation, rather a qualification.)
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:57 pm
by NerdGirl
See, what I remember learning in school is that if the stuff inside the quotation marks is a complete sentence, then the period goes inside. If not, it goes outside. If I ever find my Strunk and White book, I'll see if that has anything to say about it.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:57 pm
by Unit of Energy
Commas and periods always go inside the quotation marks, unless followed by a parenthetical reference. Question marks, exclamation points and dashes go outside quotation marks only if they do not apply to the quotation.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:08 pm
by thebigcheese
Has anyone else had enough of these so-called "grammar rules"? I think we should all say, "Screw it!"

Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:22 pm
by Katya
NerdGirl wrote:...with my thesis advisor. I will probably ask several questions here over the next few months. Today's question is which of the following is correct?
1. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list".
2. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list."
British conventions say #1. American conventions say #2. According to Wikipedia, Canada sides with the US on this one, but I'd pull out the appropriate style guide for your field and region, just to be sure. (For what it's worth, the American argument is that the comma outside the quotes is ugly, and the British argument is that the comma inside the quotes is illogical.)
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:49 pm
by TheAnswerIs42
See, and I wouldn't even blink about that. I see no logic in #2. I love what thebigcheese did - to me, those are two good examples of when it should be outside and when it should be inside. Things go inside if they are part of the quote, outside if they are not.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:55 pm
by Marduk
thebigcheese wrote:Has anyone else had enough of these so-called "grammar rules"? I think we should all say, "Screw it!"

Wait, should we all say, "Screw it!"?
Or should we all say, "Screw it"!
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:10 pm
by krebscout
I just wanted to point out that I appreciate how this board is a great go-to place for questions like these. It's like the Board, but much faster.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:38 pm
by Dead Cat
krebscout wrote:I just wanted to point out that I appreciate how this board is a great go-to place for questions like these. It's like the Board, but much faster.
Maybe we should rename it "The Less than 100 Hour Board."
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:50 pm
by thebigcheese
Haha! Great idea.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:28 pm
by Whistler
Katya wrote:NerdGirl wrote:...with my thesis advisor. I will probably ask several questions here over the next few months. Today's question is which of the following is correct?
1. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list".
2. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list."
American conventions say #1. British conventions say #2. According to Wikipedia, Canada sides with the US on this one, but I'd pull out the appropriate style guide for your field and region, just to be sure. (For what it's worth, the American argument is that the comma outside the quotes is ugly, and the British argument is that the comma inside the quotes is illogical.)
wait... don't you mean american conventions favor #2?
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:02 am
by Katya
Whistler wrote:Katya wrote:NerdGirl wrote:...with my thesis advisor. I will probably ask several questions here over the next few months. Today's question is which of the following is correct?
1. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list".
2. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list."
American conventions say #1. British conventions say #2. According to Wikipedia, Canada sides with the US on this one, but I'd pull out the appropriate style guide for your field and region, just to be sure. (For what it's worth, the American argument is that the comma outside the quotes is ugly, and the British argument is that the comma inside the quotes is illogical.)
wait... don't you mean american conventions favor #2?
My bad. Fixed.