The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
-
NerdGirl
- President of the Lutheran Sisterhood Gun Club
- Posts: 1810
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:41 am
- Location: Calgary
The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
...with my thesis advisor. I will probably ask several questions here over the next few months. Today's question is which of the following is correct?
1. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list".
2. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list."
1. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list".
2. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list."
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
It's begun to make a lot more sense to me to put the punctuation outside the quotation marks, but that's not what I learned in school. I have to consciously put the punctuation inside the quotation marks now, because I think that's what's correct. Unfortunately.
- Dragon Lady
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:07 pm
- Location: Riverton, UT
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
The Heartless Siren (Board proofreader who doesn't read the boardboard) would tell you #2. I sometimes agree with her, but I think #1 can have its moments of appropriateness. Esp. if it's a question mark or exclamation point that is applicable to the sentence at large, but not what's in the quote. For example: Did he really just say, "I love her"? If you put the question mark inside the quotes, he's now not sure that he loves her. Which definitely changes the meaning.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Yeah, this is where grammar/punctuation thugs annoy me. The "correct" answer is that it should go inside the quotation marks, but the reality is that punctuation is a manmade construct that can be modified through popular usage in particular ways. Consequently, if it makes more sense to go outside of the quotation marks, we really ought not think we're constrained by "the rules." (Note that there, I didn't think putting the period inside of the quotation mark would cause any undue confusion and wasn't part of an actual quotation, rather a qualification.)
-
NerdGirl
- President of the Lutheran Sisterhood Gun Club
- Posts: 1810
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:41 am
- Location: Calgary
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
See, what I remember learning in school is that if the stuff inside the quotation marks is a complete sentence, then the period goes inside. If not, it goes outside. If I ever find my Strunk and White book, I'll see if that has anything to say about it.
- Unit of Energy
- Title Bar Moderator
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:35 pm
- Location: Planet Earth...I think.
- Contact:
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Commas and periods always go inside the quotation marks, unless followed by a parenthetical reference. Question marks, exclamation points and dashes go outside quotation marks only if they do not apply to the quotation.
-
thebigcheese
- Someone's Favorite
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:08 am
- Location: Provo, UT
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Has anyone else had enough of these so-called "grammar rules"? I think we should all say, "Screw it!"

Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
British conventions say #1. American conventions say #2. According to Wikipedia, Canada sides with the US on this one, but I'd pull out the appropriate style guide for your field and region, just to be sure. (For what it's worth, the American argument is that the comma outside the quotes is ugly, and the British argument is that the comma inside the quotes is illogical.)NerdGirl wrote:...with my thesis advisor. I will probably ask several questions here over the next few months. Today's question is which of the following is correct?
1. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list".
2. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list."
Last edited by Katya on Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
- TheAnswerIs42
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:13 pm
- Location: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
See, and I wouldn't even blink about that. I see no logic in #2. I love what thebigcheese did - to me, those are two good examples of when it should be outside and when it should be inside. Things go inside if they are part of the quote, outside if they are not.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Wait, should we all say, "Screw it!"?thebigcheese wrote:Has anyone else had enough of these so-called "grammar rules"? I think we should all say, "Screw it!"
Or should we all say, "Screw it"!
Deus ab veritas
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
I just wanted to point out that I appreciate how this board is a great go-to place for questions like these. It's like the Board, but much faster.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Maybe we should rename it "The Less than 100 Hour Board."krebscout wrote:I just wanted to point out that I appreciate how this board is a great go-to place for questions like these. It's like the Board, but much faster.
"If you don't put enough commas in, you won't know where to breathe and will die of asphyxiation"
--Jasper Fforde
--Jasper Fforde
-
thebigcheese
- Someone's Favorite
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:08 am
- Location: Provo, UT
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
Haha! Great idea.
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
wait... don't you mean american conventions favor #2?Katya wrote:American conventions say #1. British conventions say #2. According to Wikipedia, Canada sides with the US on this one, but I'd pull out the appropriate style guide for your field and region, just to be sure. (For what it's worth, the American argument is that the comma outside the quotes is ugly, and the British argument is that the comma inside the quotes is illogical.)NerdGirl wrote:...with my thesis advisor. I will probably ask several questions here over the next few months. Today's question is which of the following is correct?
1. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list".
2. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list."
Re: The ongoing war over the use of the English language...
My bad. Fixed.Whistler wrote:wait... don't you mean american conventions favor #2?Katya wrote:American conventions say #1. British conventions say #2. According to Wikipedia, Canada sides with the US on this one, but I'd pull out the appropriate style guide for your field and region, just to be sure. (For what it's worth, the American argument is that the comma outside the quotes is ugly, and the British argument is that the comma inside the quotes is illogical.)NerdGirl wrote:...with my thesis advisor. I will probably ask several questions here over the next few months. Today's question is which of the following is correct?
1. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list".
2. Dude published a list that he called "my awesome list."