This is amazing! Makes so much sense (similar to boiling point elevation, I assume), and yet, here I am, learning something by reading (gasp!) the Internet. Makes me want to geek out and find the exact stoichiometric ratios at 4,000 and 5,280 and 0 feet elevation . . .In high-altitude areas, like Colorado and Utah, fuels with an octane rating of 85 are sold because the atmosphere is at a lower pressure than at sea level. The compression pressure in a naturally aspirated engine will therefore be lower than at sea level, meaning a more "volatile" fuel can be used safely in higher altitudes (i.e., an engine that normally runs on an octane rating of 87 at sea level will run just fine on an octane rating of 85 at higher altitudes).
Kudos, Democritus. This is what keeps the board interesting.
Fun fact: I live at 600 feet in Western Washington, and I worked the last 4 months at sea level. Twice it dumped considerable more snow here than there: in November, about 8 inches (would have been respectable even in Utah) compared to 2-3; just a couple of weeks ago, 2-3, compared to zero (a weird situation to call in a no-show: "well, there is snow on the ground everywhere here, no way to get up and down the hill, no buses . . ." I swear, I know it's probably just raining there!).
I definitely miss my thin mountain air. Going up Mt. Rainier, etc. is so refreshing!